I'm not sure I agree with number 4 "Authors should annotate source code before the review begins". This source code will live on beyond the code review. If it

I'm not sure I agree with number 4 "Authors should annotate source code before the review begins". This source code will live on beyond the code review. If it requires annotation for the code review to occur, how will it stand up when the next dev comes along to make changes. Is the next dev expected to revisit many of the recent code reviews including the changes? Some context, or annotation, could be good to have in the commit message. In most cases, I believe the changes and the code should live on their own, without annotation.