2 ms·
This title is clickbait. They were politely and apologetically asked to leave, since they snuck in and didn't have a press pass. As to why they didn't get a pr
by gkoberger 11y ago
This title is clickbait. They were politely and apologetically asked to leave, since they snuck in and didn't have a press pass.
As to why they didn't get a press pass, who knows. But they've been extremely negative toward YC companies in the past. YC isn't running a White House press conference; they're running an event with the unabashed goal of helping their companies succeed. You wouldn't invite your bitter ex to your wedding.
As for why TC writes so much about YC companies: I know a bunch of YC companies that didn't get a TC write-up, and I know some that had negative writeups. Like it or not for Pando (or anyone else), it's mutually exclusive: the launch of a YC company is news, and launching on TC is a Silicon Valley rite of passage. TechCrunch wants YC startups, YC startups want TechCrunch.
(On a more personal note, being a founder is really fucking hard. It's the hardest thing I've ever done. YC is the only organization in the valley I've ever felt had my back 100%, and truly had my best interests in heart. VCs and press may complain about Demo Day, but who cares: YC makes decisions based on what's best for its companies, not the press or VCs. I can't thank YC enough for everything they did to protect, help and nurture us as an early-stage company.)
- caminante 11y agoReading your comment, I couldn't help but chuckle at the irony. Here we have...a site with a paywall COMPLAINING about access to information. This "journalist" hoped to skate in and get something worth "$10 a month" to write about. After failing, he scrambled, spinning a conspiracy and making himself the story.