Science might not be broken for the reasons mentioned, but I find the article overlooks the greatest evidence of all which is the article itself. Objectively d

Science might not be broken for the reasons mentioned, but I find the article overlooks the greatest evidence of all which is the article itself. Objectively deconstructing the practice of p-hacking is science at work and a scientific work. So say, if we devised a way to measure p-value based research for it's p-hack-ability, we would have a way to validate what that research is saying (or not saying), as well as test the integrity of the research and its researchers.