4 ms·
Heroku's value-add is that you don't need a system administrator: if they support the services your app needs, then they automate system administration for you.
by matchu 11y ago
Heroku's value-add is that you don't need a system administrator: if they support the services your app needs, then they automate system administration for you.
Digital Ocean will sell you a VPS (essentially a machine) and grant you root-level access to it. You can run whatever you want, and deploy and manage it however you want.
Heroku will sell you a dyno (essentially a worker process) and grant you access to a set of deployment and management tools. You push your application code up to Heroku, and it automatically sets up the front-facing web server, the database, the cache service, etc., according to the add-ons you've selected. If you need to scale up, just purchase more dynos.
For complex apps, Heroku might not meet your needs and you might want some VPSs instead. In terms of price, though, you'd need to include system administration man-hours when comparing.
- 67726e 11y agoNot as feature rich as Heroku, but AWS' Elastic Beanstalk was so much easier for me to get my Java/Spring application up and running. I had endless headaches on Heroku. Elastic Beanstalk was simple upload a WAR and off to the races. Considering most folks probably wind up with AWS as a deployment target and EB is at no additional cost over the normal AWS costs, it's probably worth looking into right off the bat.