Much narrower focus than dluan's proposal (climate science only); pretty much entirely one-sided (criticizes work supporting the consensus view only, kinda like

Much narrower focus than dluan's proposal (climate science only); pretty much entirely one-sided (criticizes work supporting the consensus view only, kinda like if Batman only fought the cops). The guy who runs it isn't a scientist (though you could argue that he's a statistician, which might be about as good for dluan's purposes). So I don't think this really fits dluan's description very well.