3 ms·
So empirically speaking their reliability is far, far worse than stated just based on that one data point.
by Tloewald 11y ago
So empirically speaking their reliability is far, far worse than stated just based on that one data point.
- onethumb 11y agoHow so? We'd need to know both how much data cjensen lost and how much data Glacier has in it to tell, neither of which I know from this conversation.
- cjensen 11y agoMy recollection: around 20GB... however, they clearly were willing to try to get some of it back if that was helpful. It was just a redundant offsite backup for me, so there was no need.
- EduardoBautista 11y agoWould have been interesting to see if they had been able to.
- pdabbadabba 11y agoWho knows. Maybe his is the last data Glacier will lose in the next [suitably large number] years. That's bad luck, buddy!
- megablast 11y agoI too choose to extrapolate all my losses over the next 100 billion years.
- bbcbasic 11y agoNot now they have fixed the bug.