4 ms·
I never argued that it was any less wrong in those states. My point in including that line was to demonstrate that I am not the only one who believes that cheat
by robgibbons 11y ago
I never argued that it was any less wrong in those states. My point in including that line was to demonstrate that I am not the only one who believes that cheating is a moral offense against your partner, worthy of at least some repercussion. In the eyes of 21 states, it is literally a crime. So my moralisms remain absolute, regardless of the other states. The fact remains that if these hackers had not lifted these docs, not one of these incidents would have ever faced their day of reckoning from the spouses they betrayed. That to me, is justice served.
- vasilipupkin 11y agohow do you know they betrayed anyone? Have you ever considered that people may have marriages that look differently from what you think marriage should be ? to the downvoters, have you ever heard of open marriages ?
- tertius 11y agoIf there are open marriages then the spouse that was not using this service would not have a problem. Yes, the public knowing (if this bothered the open couple) is an injury.
- JoeAltmaier 11y agoThat part sounds true. But the cost of this justice was high. Privacy is under attack at every turn. Its a dirty victory.