3 ms·
Perhaps I am nit-picking but.... ROSS "is a digital legal expert" that managed not to attribute its landing page's photo legally. The photo is from here: http
by tinkerdol 11y ago
Perhaps I am nit-picking but....
ROSS "is a digital legal expert" that managed not to attribute its landing page's photo legally.
The photo is from here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Stuttgart_Bibliothek_amk.jpg?uselang=en https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Stuttgart_Bibliothek...
And according to the licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/), attribution credit as well as link to the cc license should be provided.
I think the idea is very cool by the way -- just trying to help!
- ojbyrne 11y agoThe wikipedia page, under "Permission" says "If you use this picture somewhere outside the wiki-world, I'd be happy to get a short eMail from you." I believe that's the attribution. As it says in the license section below: "attribution – You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor" So you can't really say if its not attributed properly.