3 ms·
He was charged under the Espionage Act of 1917, so it's spying, not treason as defined by the US Constitution (he hasn't levied war or adhered to an enemy, but
by ascagnel_ 11y ago
He was charged under the Espionage Act of 1917, so it's spying, not treason as defined by the US Constitution (he hasn't levied war or adhered to an enemy, but it is possible to argue that he's provided aid to an enemy through the leaks).