4 ms·
Advocating against censorship and arguing against banning subreddits is not equivalent to supporting those subreddits. Basic, undergraduate-level logic. The fa
by obstacle1 11y ago
Advocating against censorship and arguing against banning subreddits is not equivalent to supporting those subreddits. Basic, undergraduate-level logic.
The fact is that there are plenty of hateful subreddits explicitly supported by admins and mods (e.g., SRS) but the hate is pointed in the 'right' direction (i.e., +SJW).
And the point of the above is that there is clearly bias shaping the site's content from the very top. This stands in direct contradiction to the founders statements years ago about creating a "bastion of free speech".
- geofft 11y agoThe article is about hiring a CTO to take on scaling challenges, which only matters if they plan to grow. I don't see any evidence from any recent statements that they're prioritizing ideology (of any kind) over growth and profit. If keeping SRS and banning everyone else gets them growth, that's what gets them growth.