4 ms·

What is a "founding engineer"? It must not mean founder, since then one would just say "founder". It's clearly not Director of Engineering, CTO, or VP o E. I h

What is a "founding engineer"? It must not mean founder, since then one would just say "founder". It's clearly not Director of Engineering, CTO, or VP o E. I had just assumed this was new phrasing used by recruiters and business people trying to get early engineer hires that they don't want to give a real title to (because if/when the company grows they'll bring in adults to run things and get those titles.) Note, seriously asking - and not trying to take imply anything negative about Marty's (whom I don't know) abilities, or contributions to Pinterest.

bitsweet 11y ago
likely first or second employee that joined the company
jonjenk 11y ago
Former head of engineering at Pinterest here. Marty was one of the first three engineers at the company. He is an amazing guy -- smart, personable, fun to work with. This is a boon for Reddit and as a Reddit user I'm very excited. Fortunately Pinterest has a strong bench and can afford to share the wealth of their amazing engineering team.
worklogin 11y ago
Same way the Mercury Seven were "founding astronauts": the first class, the inaugural group, etc.
dang 11y ago
Ok, since "founding" is misleading (or at least distracting) we've replaced it with "early" above.
- sarahkpeck 11y ago
  Interesting, since the TechCrunch article uses the phrase 'Founding' Engineer
  - dang 11y ago
    The HN guidelines ask submitters to use the original title unless it is misleading or linkbait. In the latter cases it's standard practice for us to change them here. I don't really think the Techcrunch title was misleading, and you were certainly right to post it as is. But the word "founding" did spark an off-topic subthread, and in cases like that we've found it's easiest to just remove the objection.
hkmurakami 11y ago
Basically "Engineer hire #1" (or similar) that was on board super early but wasn't part of the founding team when the team itself was formed. I am guessing the distinction is to delineate the fact that the engineer did not join 1+ year from company founding, which is often the case for Engineer #1.
- optimusclimb 11y ago
  So basically founder minus the shares?
  - x0x0 11y ago
    and not promoted to direng/cto or (s)he would have use that title, though maybe the company has a policy of not promoting interally
  - hkmurakami 11y ago
    Well in the case I saw it was founder minus the shares plus quite good pay.

bitsweet 11y ago

likely first or second employee that joined the company

jonjenk 11y ago

Former head of engineering at Pinterest here. Marty was one of the first three engineers at the company. He is an amazing guy -- smart, personable, fun to work with. This is a boon for Reddit and as a Reddit user I'm very excited. Fortunately Pinterest has a strong bench and can afford to share the wealth of their amazing engineering team.

worklogin 11y ago

Same way the Mercury Seven were "founding astronauts": the first class, the inaugural group, etc.

dang 11y ago

Ok, since "founding" is misleading (or at least distracting) we've replaced it with "early" above.

sarahkpeck 11y ago
Interesting, since the TechCrunch article uses the phrase 'Founding' Engineer
- dang 11y ago
  The HN guidelines ask submitters to use the original title unless it is misleading or linkbait. In the latter cases it's standard practice for us to change them here. I don't really think the Techcrunch title was misleading, and you were certainly right to post it as is. But the word "founding" did spark an off-topic subthread, and in cases like that we've found it's easiest to just remove the objection.

hkmurakami 11y ago

Basically "Engineer hire #1" (or similar) that was on board super early but wasn't part of the founding team when the team itself was formed. I am guessing the distinction is to delineate the fact that the engineer did not join 1+ year from company founding, which is often the case for Engineer #1.

optimusclimb 11y ago
So basically founder minus the shares?
- x0x0 11y ago
  and not promoted to direng/cto or (s)he would have use that title, though maybe the company has a policy of not promoting interally
- hkmurakami 11y ago
  Well in the case I saw it was founder minus the shares plus quite good pay.