3 ms·
and,,, you seem to have completely have missed the point. if OSS is organic and evolutionary, we shouldn't be discussing market-share strategies. LO, keep on d
by oneJob 11y ago
and,,, you seem to have completely have missed the point.
if OSS is organic and evolutionary, we shouldn't be discussing market-share strategies. LO, keep on doin'. AOO, you keep on doin' too.
i wouldn't argue anything particular here, just would like to point out that the sentiment of the open-letter is one of coordinated community action, which emphasis on the coordinated.
if i wanted coordination, i'd join an organization, like, maybe, a company, like, maybe, microsoft. naw, i'll just keep on doin'.
- scholia 11y agoNot really. The whole point of Schaller's Open Letter is that he thinks people are being led to use an inferior version of open source code. In fact, he says: “Letting users believe that OpenOffice is still alive and evolving is only damaging the general reputation of open source Office software among non-technical users.” This really doesn't have anything to do with market share per se. He just thinks that marketing an inferior product with almost no community support is bad for users and bad for open source.