3 ms·

Yeah so i'm not sure, i'm probably saying really stupid stuff now, but i love the way my WM (Xmonad as stated before) is really simple as far as key bindings go

Yeah so i'm not sure, i'm probably saying really stupid stuff now, but i love the way my WM (Xmonad as stated before) is really simple as far as key bindings go: no chords. I like that, because i don't want RSI. I have the impression though that moving more towards an Emacs way of managing my desktops would be laborious, frankly. Maybe i'm just projecting after my disagreeable experience with Ratpoison (only a 2-pane split? Hm.).

zeveb 11y ago
> i love the way my WM (Xmonad as stated before) is really simple as far as key bindings go: no chords Really? Looking at the docs (http://xmonad.org/manpage.html#default-keyboard-bindings http://xmonad.org/manpage.html#default-keyboard-bindings) it looks like it has mod-KEY and mod-shift-KEY chords. Nothing wrong with that, of course. It's easy enough to set up StumpWM to support those bindings, if one wishes. Not saying that everyone should be using it, of course! xmonad's a fine WM I'm sure.