4 ms·
A hundred times this. Same setup for me, except that i'm considering moving to Stump WM or Guile-WM as a result of heavily drinking the Lisp / Libre koolaid.
by toothbrush 11y ago
A hundred times this. Same setup for me, except that i'm considering
moving to Stump WM or Guile-WM as a result of heavily drinking the
Lisp / Libre koolaid. Let people pry my Emacs and tiling window
manager from my cold dead hands! :)
- zeveb 11y agoStumpWM is really, really nice to use. And it integrates great with emacs+SLIME. It's really the wave of the future.
- toothbrush 11y agoYeah so i'm not sure, i'm probably saying really stupid stuff now, but i love the way my WM (Xmonad as stated before) is really simple as far as key bindings go: no chords. I like that, because i don't want RSI. I have the impression though that moving more towards an Emacs way of managing my desktops would be laborious, frankly. Maybe i'm just projecting after my disagreeable experience with Ratpoison (only a 2-pane split? Hm.).
- zeveb 11y ago> i love the way my WM (Xmonad as stated before) is really simple as far as key bindings go: no chords Really? Looking at the docs (http://xmonad.org/manpage.html#default-keyboard-bindings http://xmonad.org/manpage.html#default-keyboard-bindings) it looks like it has mod-KEY and mod-shift-KEY chords. Nothing wrong with that, of course. It's easy enough to set up StumpWM to support those bindings, if one wishes. Not saying that everyone should be using it, of course! xmonad's a fine WM I'm sure.