5 ms·
How long until Google becomes an authority and just starts handing out SSL certificates for free? Doesn't this sound like something they would already be doing
by dpcan 17y ago
How long until Google becomes an authority and just starts handing out SSL certificates for free?
Doesn't this sound like something they would already be doing?
- windsurfer 17y agoWould Microsoft accept a Google-signed certificate? Would Microsoft pre-install such certificates by default?
- dangrossman 17y agoIs there some reason Microsoft would not want to accept a Google signed certificate?
- tptacek 17y agoIs there some reason Microsoft would want to accept a Google root certificate?
- ars 17y agoRegulatory or consumer pressure. The desire to not have the appearance of anti-competitive actions.
- tptacek 17y ago... are fuzzy arguments that will be torpedoed by any weal security argument Microsoft deploys against them. Turn this over on its head. What about Mozilla accepting a Microsoft-run CA?
- blasdel 17y agoI really hope they would -- it'd be extremely nice for vanilla Windows Server installs to be able to provision themselves a default certificate. Of course, Mozilla are the asshats that innovated the draconian dialog maze for self-signed certificates, and as such have made it impossible to ship appliances with HTTPS web interfaces. I hope their heads fall off. Don't you really want WiFi access point config pages to be HTTPS-only?
- tptacek 17y agoIn my experience, Mozilla comes in for the harshest criticism from the people who understand TLS the least.
- windsurfer 17y agoI think it's great that Mozilla made it difficult to use self-signed certs. Most people don't use them correctly, and making self-signed essentially off limits to people is a great increase in security. You should try using ettercap. It's surprisingly easy to intercept all traffic going to and from a self-signed site.
- deleted 17y ago[deleted]
- mey 17y agoGoogle will most likely be a CA on Chrome OS systems and Android systems eventually.