5 ms·

It means San Francisco, they're both there.

pavlov 11y ago
Sorry, I forgot the sarcasm tags. The point was that it's not the kind of reply you should make in a public issue tracker. It comes off as: "We're only interested in talking to people who are in San Francisco and are cool enough to hang out with us."
- tristor 11y ago
  Which was precisely what was meant by it in my reading. Unsurprising really given the way many people act right now in SV.
  - roghummal 11y ago
    >Unsurprising really given the way many people act right now in SV. Except he's in SF.
- brndnmtthws 11y ago
  Hmm...no, it's not like that. I have a lot of meetings with a lot of people, it's part of my day job. He's just one of our many users, with whom I like to engage directly.
  - alblue 11y ago
    By excluding all of the other users (most of whom aren't in SF, or even in USA) from the conversation? And you can't see why people believe you were trying to bury the item and/or get him to sign an NDA because he was "visiting your offices"?
  - tsuraan 11y ago
    I had a rant to one of your other comments that I deleted as probably being non-productive, but this is the second comment of a similar vein that I've seen from you, so I'll actually reply this time. Aphyr tests distributed systems to destruction. He seems to be really good at it. You've had an account here for nearly three years, and you write distributed software; it's fairly shocking to me that you're not familiar with his work. You should browse https://aphyr.com/tags/jepsen https://aphyr.com/tags/jepsen for a bit, to get a feel for what he does. As an anecdotal aside, I tend to use aphyr's interactions with a development team as a bit of an indicator about the team's quality. A team that acknowledges the problems that he's finding and hurries to address them is probably a good one. A team that outright denies that the problems exist is a pretty poor one. Your responses to #513 (especially the nerd raging bit) aren't encouraging.
  - wglb 11y ago
    You may want to step back, take a deep breath, and read this from the point of view a potential user of your software and see how it might be an attempt to Davidson the discussion, keeping the report of a bug quiet? It certainly doesn't give me the impression of transparency.
  - ZoF 11y ago
    Really don't think you handled this one well m8.
- msbarnett 11y ago
  > "We're only interested in talking to people who are in San Francisco and are cool enough to hang out with us." I read it less as that and more "you are embarrassing us by discussing our product's flaws in public. please bring this behind closed doors"

Sorry, I forgot the sarcasm tags. The point was that it's not the kind of reply you should make in a public issue tracker. It comes off as: "We're only interested in talking to people who are in San Francisco and are cool enough to hang out with us."

tristor 11y ago
Which was precisely what was meant by it in my reading. Unsurprising really given the way many people act right now in SV.
- roghummal 11y ago
  >Unsurprising really given the way many people act right now in SV. Except he's in SF.
brndnmtthws 11y ago
Hmm...no, it's not like that. I have a lot of meetings with a lot of people, it's part of my day job. He's just one of our many users, with whom I like to engage directly.
- alblue 11y ago
  By excluding all of the other users (most of whom aren't in SF, or even in USA) from the conversation? And you can't see why people believe you were trying to bury the item and/or get him to sign an NDA because he was "visiting your offices"?
- tsuraan 11y ago
  I had a rant to one of your other comments that I deleted as probably being non-productive, but this is the second comment of a similar vein that I've seen from you, so I'll actually reply this time. Aphyr tests distributed systems to destruction. He seems to be really good at it. You've had an account here for nearly three years, and you write distributed software; it's fairly shocking to me that you're not familiar with his work. You should browse https://aphyr.com/tags/jepsen https://aphyr.com/tags/jepsen for a bit, to get a feel for what he does. As an anecdotal aside, I tend to use aphyr's interactions with a development team as a bit of an indicator about the team's quality. A team that acknowledges the problems that he's finding and hurries to address them is probably a good one. A team that outright denies that the problems exist is a pretty poor one. Your responses to #513 (especially the nerd raging bit) aren't encouraging.
- wglb 11y ago
  You may want to step back, take a deep breath, and read this from the point of view a potential user of your software and see how it might be an attempt to Davidson the discussion, keeping the report of a bug quiet? It certainly doesn't give me the impression of transparency.
- ZoF 11y ago
  Really don't think you handled this one well m8.
msbarnett 11y ago
> "We're only interested in talking to people who are in San Francisco and are cool enough to hang out with us." I read it less as that and more "you are embarrassing us by discussing our product's flaws in public. please bring this behind closed doors"