Also, they make an argument about density and interference that IMO shouldn't be dismissed out of hand. The point isn't worthless in general, but it's worthles

Also, they make an argument about density and interference that IMO shouldn't be dismissed out of hand. The point isn't worthless in general, but it's worthless in the context of the text and principle of 44 US Code 333. In that case, I will dismiss it out of hand. it's worth keeping in mind that mobile hotspots can fall afoul of the very same principle and law behind that fine What mobile hotspots maliciously interfere with eachother's operation?