3 ms·

Don't be so naive. Do you think you can just walk up to Mozilla and tell them: "Sup guys, just bundle this crap into your browser. Please."?

• deleted 11y ago
  [deleted]
• detaro 11y ago
  Mozilla claims that they don't get money for the integration, and I don't see a good reason why I shouldn't believe them. Pocket very likely doesn't have that much money lying around, compared to Mozillas budget.
  • balladeer 11y ago
    That's makes it worse. Mozilla integrating Pocket into Firefox for free.
    • JosephRedfern 11y ago
      Really? Does it? "Mozilla bundles crapware for financial gain" vs "Mozilla bundling add-on it believes will benefit users".
      • throwaway2048 11y ago
        its sounds a lot more like the situation was "Pocket was friends with some guys at mozilla, and they made up a bunch of bullshit about how it was a benefit to users to push their buddies project"
        • johnny22 11y ago
          where did you get that impression?
      • yellowapple 11y ago
        "Mozilla bundles crapware for financial gain" v. "Mozilla bundles crapware without any financial incentive" is a more accurate comparison, and highlights that something is indeed wonky over in Mozillaland.
        • pnathan 11y ago
          Pocket + Firefox is a pretty stanky integration. Very unpleasant to have it bundled in.
          • jdpage 11y ago
            Maybe it's time for a standard bookmarking service API? It'd be nice to just be able to plug whatever service I want (if any) into any browser.
      • bobcostas55 11y ago
        Greedy is better than stupid.