Interesting work. Some questions: 1) Have you have discussed your work with the current ECMAscript committee, or interacted with them at all? 2) Why did you c

Interesting work. Some questions: 1) Have you have discussed your work with the current ECMAscript committee, or interacted with them at all? 2) Why did you choose to focus on packages and classes? Why not other stuff along the lines of where ES5/ES6 is moving currently? Are there other ways to move forward in JS Programming-In-The-Large research instead of just straight up OO extensions? In Coders At Work, Brendan Eich suggests that academic and industrial influence on ECMAScript needs to evolve hand in hand, but not just directly along the "expected" line of OO features. Do you have any thoughts on that? - Small note: Make sure to spell-check your paper and have a native English speaker proof-read it for you :). The first page has some errors like "witch" and "althought" and "avaible".