3 ms·
but still... 203K!? i remember the 90s when the last round of leap frogging superconductor materials were being developed - every conference even vaguely relate
by jgamman 11y ago
but still... 203K!? i remember the 90s when the last round of leap frogging superconductor materials were being developed - every conference even vaguely related to solid state chem/physics seemed to set a new record. And H2S? it's hardly an exotic material. maybe it's just the (near dead) chemist in me geeking out ;-)
- cbd1984 11y ago> the (near dead) chemist Work around enough H2S and it will take you the rest of the way. My point is, it has enough problems with flagrant toxicity that containment of non-trivial amounts of it will be either massively expensive, totally inadequate (especially in the event of an earthquake, fire, fire caused by earthquake...), or both.
- Shivetya 11y agowhich means we can have our Star Trek future, we got a great poison with a needed application and all we need is exploding computer displays. Massively expensive is not a limitation if the need is there.