3 ms·
Sure we can because dressed up Cato report clones "addendums" aren't science. Exposing the crap and bias is how to keep it real. Otherwise, inventing new name
by bro-stick 11y ago
Sure we can because dressed up Cato report clones "addendums" aren't science. Exposing the crap and bias is how to keep it real. Otherwise, inventing new names is passing the buck from critical thinking, awareness and fact-checking. They're the PR problem, not the scientific method. Most of the legit scientific communities needs to get better at/hire PR to trash the crap and the talking head charlatans. Emperors new clothes lingo doesn't remove the jerks that condone personal threats to climate scientists.
- acqq 11y ago> Most of the legit scientific communities needs to get better at/hire PR to trash the crap We know that these communities are not funded for that. The other side however, is, and only with the mission to introduce the confusion.
- bro-stick 11y agoThen their message won't be heard, and their research will be for naught if they cannot defend themselves in forums where it counts. A related principle: a company with amazing products (Hlaska and countless others) fails if no one knows about it.