I'd argue that is still fundamentally different than just requiring the signature to keep your job. Getting laid off has different consequences than quitting.

I'd argue that is still fundamentally different than just requiring the signature to keep your job. Getting laid off has different consequences than quitting. I realize most states disagree with me, but I think it's absurd. If at will employment is so meaningless that it's no different from being fired, it shouldn't even be consideration in the first place. These courts are treating at will employment as a meaningless promise in one scenario, but as having some value in another.