3 ms·
Frankly, my experience on mainframes is that UNIX is a stronghold there for a reason. I'd be far more interested in this ecosystem opening up by having strong
by tristor 11y ago
Frankly, my experience on mainframes is that UNIX is a stronghold there for a reason. I'd be far more interested in this ecosystem opening up by having strong mainframe vendor support for running Illumos and/or FreeBSD, and less concerned with running Linux. Among other things, Zones are more useful than lxc, and in this type of environment you often need strong kernel support for specialized high-speed interconnects and real-time operations, which Linux only has experimental support for but is integrated well in the UNIX world. I love Linux and what it's done for the world, but UNIX isn't dead for a reason, there are still many things it is superior at.
- the_why_of_y 11y agoThis is an odd remark - apparently AIX/ESA, the AIX version for mainframe hardware was discontinued "in the late 1990s", roughly the same time when IBM started to invest in Linux. http://www.lookupmainframesoftware.com/soft_detail/dispsoft/1581 http://www.lookupmainframesoftware.com/soft_detail/dispsoft/... There was also Amdahl UTS, which was sold to a company UTS Global around 2000 that appears defunct now. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amdahl_UTS https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amdahl_UTS So where is this stronghold of AT&T descendant UNIXes on mainframes then?
- tolle 11y agoNowhere, but some people call System I/(A/400)/I-Series a mainframe. It's midrange, but people call it what they call it. Anyway, IBM i and AIX run on the same hardware. They used to be called System I and System P. Now it's just Power Systems. Maybe thats what he ment. Or well, come to think of it. There is a UNIX side to z/OS itself.