3 ms·

Right, I fear that this is another article that, while interesting, will be used to needlessly complicate discussions about weight loss. Paying attention to the

Right, I fear that this is another article that, while interesting, will be used to needlessly complicate discussions about weight loss. Paying attention to the (inexact) reported calorie information on the food you eat is still the only reliable way to lose weight.

randlet 11y ago
Yup. The same goes for gaining weight of course. I've heard people say "I can't gain weight no matter how hard I try or how much I eat!". Wrong. Again, track your calories and increase the number of calories you are eating until you begin to gain weight.
Someone1234 11y ago
> reported calorie information on the food you eat is still the only reliable way to lose weight. Carbohydrate and sugar reductions seem like a very reliable way too. There are many anecdotes about successful weight loss on diets that allowed the person to "eat as much as they want" but had to limit their daily intake of carbohydrates.
- TurboHaskal 11y ago
  This is just a way to reduce calorie intake, indirectly.
- n4r9 11y ago
  There's a fundamental difference between these approaches which is not highlighted enough in discussions about weight loss. There is a physiological factor: weight loss is attributable to calories in vs calories out (despite those figures being difficult to obtain). Then there's the psychological factor: some diets are easier to stick to than others, and some will naturally cause you to eat fewer calories than others. Using reported calorie information is a physiological method, and appeals to those who prefer quantifying and tracking their everyday life. Carbohydrate reduction is (in this sense) a psychological method, and appeals to those who struggle with cravings and a lack of structure.
- luso_brazilian 11y ago
  Limiting the daily intake of carbs is a proxy for limiting the daily intake of calories. 1 bowl (2 cups of rice, about 330g, more or less 1 serving in areas where white rice is a staple food) have a 331 kcal [1] Even if one would ate a whole package of Canadian Bacon (6 oz, 139g) it would only be 257 kcal [2]. Carbs are very easy to gorge. A medium sized fast food cup of soda is 180kcal. Same cup for raw orange juice is 223kcal. For comparison 150g of beef is 274kcal and that would be a big serving (IMO). When people cut carbs from their diets they end up cutting the most densely caloric food: pasta, rice, starch and sugar and that's a good thing too, even eating as much of the rest as they want they will hardly be able to overconsume calories. [1] http://ndb.nal.usda.gov/ndb/foods/show/6497?man=&lfacet=&count=&max=35&qlookup=20089&offset=&sort=&format=Abridged&reportfmt=other&rptfrm=&ndbno=&nutrient1=&nutrient2=&nutrient3=&subset=&totCount=&measureby=&_action_show=Apply+Changes&Qv=1&Q12258=2 http://ndb.nal.usda.gov/ndb/foods/show/6497?man=&lfacet=&cou... [2] http://ndb.nal.usda.gov/ndb/foods/show/2636?fgcd=&manu=&lfacet=&format=&count=&max=35&offset=&sort=&qlookup=bacon http://ndb.nal.usda.gov/ndb/foods/show/2636?fgcd=&manu=&lfac...

randlet 11y ago

Yup. The same goes for gaining weight of course. I've heard people say "I can't gain weight no matter how hard I try or how much I eat!". Wrong. Again, track your calories and increase the number of calories you are eating until you begin to gain weight.

Someone1234 11y ago

> reported calorie information on the food you eat is still the only reliable way to lose weight. Carbohydrate and sugar reductions seem like a very reliable way too. There are many anecdotes about successful weight loss on diets that allowed the person to "eat as much as they want" but had to limit their daily intake of carbohydrates.

TurboHaskal 11y ago
This is just a way to reduce calorie intake, indirectly.
n4r9 11y ago
There's a fundamental difference between these approaches which is not highlighted enough in discussions about weight loss. There is a physiological factor: weight loss is attributable to calories in vs calories out (despite those figures being difficult to obtain). Then there's the psychological factor: some diets are easier to stick to than others, and some will naturally cause you to eat fewer calories than others. Using reported calorie information is a physiological method, and appeals to those who prefer quantifying and tracking their everyday life. Carbohydrate reduction is (in this sense) a psychological method, and appeals to those who struggle with cravings and a lack of structure.
luso_brazilian 11y ago
Limiting the daily intake of carbs is a proxy for limiting the daily intake of calories. 1 bowl (2 cups of rice, about 330g, more or less 1 serving in areas where white rice is a staple food) have a 331 kcal [1] Even if one would ate a whole package of Canadian Bacon (6 oz, 139g) it would only be 257 kcal [2]. Carbs are very easy to gorge. A medium sized fast food cup of soda is 180kcal. Same cup for raw orange juice is 223kcal. For comparison 150g of beef is 274kcal and that would be a big serving (IMO). When people cut carbs from their diets they end up cutting the most densely caloric food: pasta, rice, starch and sugar and that's a good thing too, even eating as much of the rest as they want they will hardly be able to overconsume calories. [1] http://ndb.nal.usda.gov/ndb/foods/show/6497?man=&lfacet=&count=&max=35&qlookup=20089&offset=&sort=&format=Abridged&reportfmt=other&rptfrm=&ndbno=&nutrient1=&nutrient2=&nutrient3=&subset=&totCount=&measureby=&_action_show=Apply+Changes&Qv=1&Q12258=2 http://ndb.nal.usda.gov/ndb/foods/show/6497?man=&lfacet=&cou... [2] http://ndb.nal.usda.gov/ndb/foods/show/2636?fgcd=&manu=&lfacet=&format=&count=&max=35&offset=&sort=&qlookup=bacon http://ndb.nal.usda.gov/ndb/foods/show/2636?fgcd=&manu=&lfac...