3 ms·
I think this is because the abstractions are so abstract. When functionality is glued together with very general combinators and operators there's not really mu
by boothead 11y ago
I think this is because the abstractions are so abstract. When functionality is glued together with very general combinators and operators there's not really much to grab hold of unless you understand the abstractions.
- QuantumRoar 11y agoWell said. What always saved me is that brave and devoted individuals wrote tutorials and published them to help me peel away the layers of abstractions. There's no way I could have done that on my own.
- boothead 11y agoWhich is why I view haskell's community as one of its main, less tangible qualities. :-) edit clarity - Apparently my brain is too Haskelled today for writing English
- Symmetry 11y agoSometimes, but sometimes a function just has a type of String -> String with nothing besides the name to tell you what it does.