3 ms·
I can't vote for I-1401 and it's not because I am in favor of the trafficking of endangered animal parts. The initiative is fatally flawed, in my opinion, beca
by techsupporter 11y ago
I can't vote for I-1401 and it's not because I am in favor of the trafficking of endangered animal parts. The initiative is fatally flawed, in my opinion, because it creates yet another crime that is punishable with time in jail but has no elements of intent or willfulness. Just like the absurdity of finding a bald eagle feather on the ground and, not knowing what it is, taking it home and using it in a mural that is later "sold or distributed" then being convicted of trafficking in part of an endangered species, I-1401 continues and broadens that trend.
If only the new section 3, paragraph 1 had read: "...for a person, who knew or reasonably should have known that the animal source is a covered animal species, to sell, offer to sell..."
Until then, I'm not willing to give license to criminalize any more accidental or unknowing behavior, especially not with jail time and a mandatory minimum penalty of TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS, which is four-freaking-times the total market value needed to be convicted of "unlawful trafficking in the second degree." (Section 3, paragraph (4)(a).)
- tim333 11y agoAlso in terms of ivory it won't achieve much if the bulk of the demand is from China and similar places. Though I guess it might set an example for Asian countries to pass similar laws.
- adamnemecek 11y agoThe US is the second largest consumer of ivory in the world. Illegal ivory comes to the US through China so by banning it in the US, you are actually reducing demand in China as well.
- adamnemecek 11y agoAre you aware of anyone who was actually prisoned for the bald eagle feather thing?