5 ms·
add -no_shared_cr3 to your boot-args. it will have an hefty performance penalty, but if you value security over performance, it'll also protect you against a l
by qwertyoruiop 11y ago
add -no_shared_cr3 to your boot-args.
it will have an hefty performance penalty, but if you value security over performance, it'll also protect you against a lot of (even 0day!) exploits.
- clebio 11y agoCould you provide some context for that? What does that flag do? How do you even set boot args for OSX? I have little context to OSX boot process, and would like to understand this better.
- facetube 11y agoI did `sudo nvram boot-args="-no_shared_cr3"`, and I think I see the (seemingly minor, at this point) performance hit. There's an explanatory comment in http://opensource.apple.com/source/xnu/xnu-2782.1.97/osfmk/x86_64/copyio.c http://opensource.apple.com/source/xnu/xnu-2782.1.97/osfmk/x... that seems to explain the feature, though not in detail.
- x0rg 11y agoWhat do you mean by "minor performance hit"? Could you provide some data?
- qwertyoruiop 11y ago'sudo nvram boot-args=-no_shared_cr3' will do the trick. The flag essentially prevents kernel from accessing userland memory unless special routines are used. Since the bug is a NULL pointer deference (which requires a read to userland memory in order to be exploited), exploitation becomes impossible. Due to this flag, however, your kernel will have to context switch every time a system call is done, which does have a noticeable performance impact. I will be releasing a KEXT to fix the bug soon.
- clebio 11y agoWell, I was more looking for an explanation of what "no shared CR3" means. What is CR3, how do I know to go to that option as a way to disable this exploit. And, coming from a Grub/ubuntu perspective, when you say "boot args", I think of the boot loader, which for Grub is configured with config files (text files) or else at boot-time, via the Grub menu. I know OSX has a single-user mode, but don't know of a way to edit boot args prior to completing the boot sequence. Please don't take this wrong. I'm glad to see the original fix you gave, so much so that I want to know more about it. What provides the capability, how to know the specific options that mitigate such a vulnerability.
- deleted 11y ago[deleted]
- glitch 11y agoCR3: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Control_register#CR3 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Control_register#CR3 Some relevant excerpts from Mac OS X and iOS Internals: To the Apple's Core by Jonathan Levi: From page 133: In 64-bit mode, there is such a huge amount of memory available anyway that it makes sense to follow the model used in other operating systems, namely to map the kernel’s address space into each and every process. This is a departure from the traditional OS X model, which had the kernel in its own address space, but it makes for much faster user/kernel transition (by sharing CR3, the control register containing the page tables). From page 266: Still, unlike Windows or Linux, OS X applications in 32-bit (Intel) used to enjoy a largely unfettered address space with virtually no kernel reservation — that is, the kernel had its own address space. Apple has conformed, however, and in 64-bit mode OS X behaves more like its monolithic peers: the kernel/user address spaces are shared, unless otherwise stated (by setting the -no-shared-cr3 boot argument on Intel architectures). The same holds true in iOS, wherein XNU currently reserves the top 2 GB of the 4 GB address space (prior to iOS version 4 the separation was 3 GB user/1 GB kernel).
- _delirium 11y agoOn the second part, Macs boot with UEFI, and the boot process is configured via a small number of variables stored in writable firmware memory [1]. Apple provides a command-line tool, nvram(8) [2], which can either print the current contents of the variables (nvram -p), or request a change to one. Changes are queued and written out at the next clean shutdown or reboot. [1] A brief description: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unified_Extensible_Firmware_Interface#Booting https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unified_Extensible_Firmware_In... [2] https://developer.apple.com/library/mac/documentation/Darwin/Reference/ManPages/man8/nvram.8.html https://developer.apple.com/library/mac/documentation/Darwin...
- amluto 11y agoCR3 is the x86 register that points to the root page table. When an OS switches between processes, it generally changes CR3. On the other hand, when an OS switches from user mode to kernel mode, it usually leaves CR3 alone. I know essentially nothing about Darwin, but "no shared CR3" presumably means that the kernel will switch CR3 to make user memory inaccessible when running in kernel mode. This is approximately what grsecurity's UDEREF feature does. On Linux, on Broadwell or newer, there's a similar HW mitigation called SMAP. Darwin might use it, too. Linux also doesn't allow unprivileged programs to map very low addresses, making NULL pointer dereferences much harder to exploit.
- facetube 11y agoThanks for the tip, applied.
- rbut 11y agoUnfortunately this 'fix' seems to break VirtualBox.