4 ms·
People without at least a masters in math are in no place to make commentary on math. 98% of the time it makes me cringe. That being said, pure math is when yo
by dmvaldman 11y ago
People without at least a masters in math are in no place to make commentary on math. 98% of the time it makes me cringe.
That being said, pure math is when you invest in the tool, applied math is when you invest in the problem. There is a very similar relationship in programming.
- jeffreyrogers 11y agoThe author has a PhD in math. And I thought the article was very good, actually. Many pure mathematicians don't care at all about applications, but the problems are just interesting in and of themselves. Take the twin primes conjecture for example, which recently got a lot of coverage as weaker forms of the conjecture were proved. Why does something like that matter at all? It doesn't. Maybe it will eventually have some sort of cryptographic application years from now, but probably not, and the people who are working on it certainly aren't motivated by that. So pure mathematician's aren't making tools purposefully. They're playing around with ideas just for the fun of it.
- rivalis 11y agoIf you're talking about the linked post, I think the person who wrote it is Colin Wright, and he has a PhD from Cambridge in Combinatorics and Graph Theory. And anyway, at least they're talking about it... Is being ignored because math is "boring" better? Maybe yes, maybe no. I suppose it depends on how "evangelical" you want to be with respect to mathematics.