4 ms·
It depends on how you define an "established" dev. The majority of developers of wallets, for instance, are for the blocksize increase. But the majority of bi
by toomim 11y ago
It depends on how you define an "established" dev.
The majority of developers of wallets, for instance, are for the blocksize increase.
But the majority of bitcoin-core developers are against it. Gavin and Jeff are the only bitcoin-core committers in favor.
This is explained in Mike Hearn's blog post, as linked in his email on this post: https://medium.com/@octskyward/why-is-bitcoin-forking-d647312d22c1 https://medium.com/@octskyward/why-is-bitcoin-forking-d64731...
- STRML 11y agoThat's not really true - Garzik has expressed support for a size increase, just more modest than Gavin and Jeff's. And the only other two committers are against both plans. That's hardly a "majority".
- toomim 11y agoGarzik is Jeff. His name is Jeff Garzik. These are not two people. I think you just counted the same person twice because you don't realize he has a first and a last name. ???
- STRML 11y agoThat's a typo, I meant Gavin and Mike, not Gavin and Jeff. The point still stands.
- toomim 11y agoHuh? 1. Mike is not a committer. The list of committers is here: https://bitcoin.org/en/development https://bitcoin.org/en/development (Wlad, Gavin, Jeff, Greg, and Pieter.) 2. Your point is that Jeff "also" is for the blocksize increase? But... but... that's what I said: "Gavin and Jeff are the only two committers in favor." So... what's your point? What's your math? Your problems go far beyond typos.
- deleted 11y ago[deleted]