4 ms·

> Let the u.s. government spy on Americans all they want since Americans seem to like being spied on, while the rest of us move on. I know that mindset doesn't

> Let the u.s. government spy on Americans all they want since Americans seem to like being spied on, while the rest of us move on. I know that mindset doesn't match many of the people here on HN, but Americans are mostly Authoritarian and seem to like the comfort they feel from programs like this. What exactly is your source on this? If we're going to stick with anecdotal evidence, I (who actually live in the US) have found most people's reaction to the Snowden revelations to be overwhelmingly negative, particularly among younger people. If we want to look at some actual data, instead of accusations about public opinion by someone who doesn't even live in the US, it appears that a majority of Americans don't approve of the NSA's actions[1]. On top of that, companies like Apple, Facebook, etc. have been implementing end to end encryption so thoroughly that the government is pushing to make it illegal[2]. So I'd thank you to not decide that all Americans like to be spied on, or that we're mostly authoritarian, just because it fits your ideology. [1]: http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/05/29/what-americans-think-about-nsa-surveillance-national-security-and-privacy/ http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/05/29/what-america... [2]: http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2015/07/08/421251662/fbi-director-says-agents-need-access-to-encrypted-data-to-preserve-public-safety http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2015/07/08/421251662/...

comrade1 11y ago
First, I'm American. I've worked on NSA and DoD projects, and I've worked for PGP. I now live in Switzerland. You only have to look at the consequences of the Snowden revelations. Nothing has really changed - some meaningless legislation was passed that moves the phone metadata recording to the phone companies from the NSA, but even then it's not clear that its stopped - the NSA data center in Utah where those conversations were recorded doesn't seem to be shutting down. I would bet the phone conversation, skype conversation, etc recording is still going on since it was never explicitly addressed anywhere in legislation. And my comment about Americans being Authoritarian is nothing new - they've long considered to be Authoritarian.
- johncolanduoni 11y ago
  > You only have to look at the consequences of the Snowden revelations. Nothing has really changed... So your evidence that the public doesn't care about the revelations is that the government (who are the perpetrators of the spying) haven't changed their ways? Could it instead be because when selecting candidates to vote for (for the minority that do vote, which is a separate problem), Americans have prioritized other issues? Do you think that the survey I cited was methodologically unsound, or that people were simply lying? How about the fact that private companies are responding by changing their platforms to be more resistant to such data collection even under warrant, and publicizing the fact? Why do you think they are doing that, if not to appease the public? > And my comment about Americans being Authoritarian is nothing new - they've long considered to be Authoritarian. By who? You? And whether or not the government is authoritarian, how does that imply the people like it?
  - jeremyjh 11y ago
    If the public cared, this would be a campaign issue, and it really isn't.
    - agarden 11y ago
      Or maybe it is just that the segment of the public that is expected to vote doesn't care. I don't vote, and I care about this issue. Why don't I vote? Mostly because the things I care about are not made campaign issues. That might be common.
      - facetube 11y ago
        You don't have to vote on every issue, candidate, or seat – there's no penalty for skipping questions. I do this routinely for issues where I either (a) don't feel qualified/informed enough, or (b) only a single candidate is available (writing in "no confidence"). If you care, please vote – even if it's just for the one guy who pledges to hold the NSA accountable for its actions.
      - manish_gill 11y ago
        The segment that doesn't care happens to be the majority. Which is exactly the point the original post made.
fnordfnordfnord 11y ago
I live in the US too, and as far as I can tell most people are barely aware of anything to do with Snowden. Of those that are, many have a negative opinion and a very unsympathetic attitude towards privacy or civil rights.
- johncolanduoni 11y ago
  I provided the Pew result because my anecdotal evidence is nearly as suspect as the one given in the post (the only difference is that I actually live in the US now). Do you think there is something wrong with the survey?
  - fnordfnordfnord 11y ago
    >Do you think there is something wrong with the survey? I'm not going to criticize a Pew survey, much, but, I do think that the set of survey participants may be distinct from the people who vote. I also think that when people are answering a survey there is very little emotion involved as opposed to when they are voting; where people are barraged with messages fully intended to stimulate emotional responses. Those are a couple of things that might explain a difference. I'd also note that it has a relatively small sample size (475). So, I don't think the survey is the last word on the matter.
- deleted 11y ago
  [deleted]
- rayiner 11y ago
  My mom thinks spying is great and my dad thinks the first amendment should have limitations so you can have laws requiring you to be sensitive to particular ethnic groups. They vote every single time. My wife and I disagree with both positions, but we never vote. Neither of those issues really bothers us enough to want to take time off work on a weekday, and we don't think there is a point when the boomers have politics locked up for another few election cycles anyway.
  - fnordfnordfnord 11y ago

comrade1 11y ago

First, I'm American. I've worked on NSA and DoD projects, and I've worked for PGP. I now live in Switzerland. You only have to look at the consequences of the Snowden revelations. Nothing has really changed - some meaningless legislation was passed that moves the phone metadata recording to the phone companies from the NSA, but even then it's not clear that its stopped - the NSA data center in Utah where those conversations were recorded doesn't seem to be shutting down. I would bet the phone conversation, skype conversation, etc recording is still going on since it was never explicitly addressed anywhere in legislation. And my comment about Americans being Authoritarian is nothing new - they've long considered to be Authoritarian.

johncolanduoni 11y ago
> You only have to look at the consequences of the Snowden revelations. Nothing has really changed... So your evidence that the public doesn't care about the revelations is that the government (who are the perpetrators of the spying) haven't changed their ways? Could it instead be because when selecting candidates to vote for (for the minority that do vote, which is a separate problem), Americans have prioritized other issues? Do you think that the survey I cited was methodologically unsound, or that people were simply lying? How about the fact that private companies are responding by changing their platforms to be more resistant to such data collection even under warrant, and publicizing the fact? Why do you think they are doing that, if not to appease the public? > And my comment about Americans being Authoritarian is nothing new - they've long considered to be Authoritarian. By who? You? And whether or not the government is authoritarian, how does that imply the people like it?
- jeremyjh 11y ago
  If the public cared, this would be a campaign issue, and it really isn't.
  - agarden 11y ago
    Or maybe it is just that the segment of the public that is expected to vote doesn't care. I don't vote, and I care about this issue. Why don't I vote? Mostly because the things I care about are not made campaign issues. That might be common.
    - facetube 11y ago
      You don't have to vote on every issue, candidate, or seat – there's no penalty for skipping questions. I do this routinely for issues where I either (a) don't feel qualified/informed enough, or (b) only a single candidate is available (writing in "no confidence"). If you care, please vote – even if it's just for the one guy who pledges to hold the NSA accountable for its actions.
    - manish_gill 11y ago
      The segment that doesn't care happens to be the majority. Which is exactly the point the original post made.

fnordfnordfnord 11y ago

I live in the US too, and as far as I can tell most people are barely aware of anything to do with Snowden. Of those that are, many have a negative opinion and a very unsympathetic attitude towards privacy or civil rights.

johncolanduoni 11y ago
I provided the Pew result because my anecdotal evidence is nearly as suspect as the one given in the post (the only difference is that I actually live in the US now). Do you think there is something wrong with the survey?
- fnordfnordfnord 11y ago
  >Do you think there is something wrong with the survey? I'm not going to criticize a Pew survey, much, but, I do think that the set of survey participants may be distinct from the people who vote. I also think that when people are answering a survey there is very little emotion involved as opposed to when they are voting; where people are barraged with messages fully intended to stimulate emotional responses. Those are a couple of things that might explain a difference. I'd also note that it has a relatively small sample size (475). So, I don't think the survey is the last word on the matter.
deleted 11y ago
[deleted]
rayiner 11y ago
My mom thinks spying is great and my dad thinks the first amendment should have limitations so you can have laws requiring you to be sensitive to particular ethnic groups. They vote every single time. My wife and I disagree with both positions, but we never vote. Neither of those issues really bothers us enough to want to take time off work on a weekday, and we don't think there is a point when the boomers have politics locked up for another few election cycles anyway.
- fnordfnordfnord 11y ago