2 ms·
The fact that they have to do this kind of "edit-a-thon" shows that Wikipedia is not sustainable. Adding content shouldn't require extraordinary effort.
by sparkzilla 11y ago
The fact that they have to do this kind of "edit-a-thon" shows that Wikipedia is not sustainable. Adding content shouldn't require extraordinary effort.
- deleted 11y ago[deleted]
- Synaesthesia 11y agoGood content does take a lot of effort to put in, people are to just going to put it in by themselves. Wikipedia is sustainable, that's why it's still around and the worlds most popular reference. The only feasible alternative is private collections of knowledge opening up to the public. Now that's would be ideal but it's not going to happen by itself either.