4 ms·
I was looking at Strongtalk the other day for the first time in some years. Unfortunately, it isn't clear at all where to best obtain the sources. Since Googl
by BruceM 11y ago
I was looking at Strongtalk the other day for the first time in some years.
Unfortunately, it isn't clear at all where to best obtain the sources.
Since Google Code is going read-only soon, it would be nice to have a canonical location outside of there.
In 2010, there was a post on the mailing list:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/strongtalk-general/SEAaPTNfwrE https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/strongtalk-general/S...
But that GitHub repo has been idle since 2010:
https://github.com/talksmall/Strongtalk https://github.com/talksmall/Strongtalk
It seems other people have also tried exporting from Google Code to GitHub as well:
https://github.com/szKarlen/strongtalk https://github.com/szKarlen/strongtalk
https://github.com/rvedam/strongtalk https://github.com/rvedam/strongtalk
https://github.com/rmacnak/strongtalk https://github.com/rmacnak/strongtalk
https://github.com/Michaelangel007/strongtalk https://github.com/Michaelangel007/strongtalk
https://github.com/DmitryVSkiba/strongtalk https://github.com/DmitryVSkiba/strongtalk
https://github.com/emanuelpeg/strongtalk https://github.com/emanuelpeg/strongtalk
https://github.com/liutanyu/strongtalk https://github.com/liutanyu/strongtalk
At that point, I got distracted and moved on to something else of interest at the time.
- david-given 11y agoIt'd be really interesting to know whether the StrongTalk type checker could be bolted on to an existing Smalltalk implementation, or whether it was inextricably part of the JIT. Smalltalk is a lovely, lovely language; being able to combine Smalltalk's dynamism with strongly-typed code where it makes sense looks like the best of both worlds (it even supports generics!). http://www.bracha.org/nwst.html http://www.bracha.org/nwst.html