4 ms·
I see a few questionable decisions in the type system: * Why is char equivalent to int8? If C2 is keeping 8-bit chars, why not use uint8? * Why isn't there a
by Sprocklem 11y ago
I see a few questionable decisions in the type system:
* Why is char equivalent to int8? If C2 is keeping 8-bit chars, why not use uint8?
* Why isn't there a primitive size type a la size_t or rust (i|u)size to increase portability?
Beyond this, when I first saw this link, I expected to be disappointed with what they'd done. I was pleasantly surprised to find I liked it.