3 ms·
> "...in direct violation of the country's constitution..." I'm too lazy to try and verify this myself. You seem to have information on how to verify this. Can
by irishcoffee 11y ago
> "...in direct violation of the country's constitution..."
I'm too lazy to try and verify this myself. You seem to have information on how to verify this. Can you point me in at least a vague general direction so I can read up more on it?
- danenania 11y agoSure, here you go: https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=4th+amendment https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&e...
- irishcoffee 11y agoThis didn't answer my question. > "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized." What was violated here? Break it down for me.