4 ms·

The reactions to the Islamist Revolution and the resulting disillusionment are complex. Two interesting/random points of entry could be: (1) Foucoult's widely d

by Jun8 11y ago

The reactions to the Islamist Revolution and the resulting disillusionment are complex. Two interesting/random points of entry could be: (1) Foucoult's widely derided (in France, not many translated to English) writings, with strong Orientalist tendencies, strongly supporting the Revolution, based on his many visits to Iran and interviews with key players (e.g. see http://newpol.org/content/revisiting-foucault-and-iranian-revolution http://newpol.org/content/revisiting-foucault-and-iranian-re... or http://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/F/bo3534884.html http://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/F/bo3534884... for a book on the subject) and (2) Persepolis (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persepolis_(comics) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persepolis_(comics)).

guard-of-terra 11y ago
From the outside it seems that the revolution is the ultimate end of habitability of Iran, end-of-world, barbarians-take-over-Rome quality. Let's stop progress, abolish human rights and heed to words written thousand years ago and interpreted by corrupt barbarians. Foucoult can write whatever nonsense sitting in warm Paris with all the freedoms and comfort readily available. I'm more scared by "Iran - then and now" series of pictures.
- mistursinistur 11y ago
  "Iran - then and now" series are often misleading. They cherry-pick extreme examples from non-representative slices of the population. We've all seen photos of the stylish, 1970s Iranian 1%, but not of pervasive poverty and disenfranchisement that their brand of progress perpetuated on the other 99%. The Shah's elite may have looked American but this doesn't mean that they presided over progress or gave much thought to human rights.
  - x5n1 11y ago
    The Muslim world has never known how to do democracy right because of a number of reasons including tribalism, nepotism, elitism. They have never understood what it means to be a liberal democracy. Add to that the colonials wanting to continue this tradition because corruption is easier to exploit and we have the precarious situation in the Middle East which has now deteriorated to an unfixable point.

by Jun8 11y ago

guard-of-terra 11y ago

From the outside it seems that the revolution is the ultimate end of habitability of Iran, end-of-world, barbarians-take-over-Rome quality. Let's stop progress, abolish human rights and heed to words written thousand years ago and interpreted by corrupt barbarians. Foucoult can write whatever nonsense sitting in warm Paris with all the freedoms and comfort readily available. I'm more scared by "Iran - then and now" series of pictures.

mistursinistur 11y ago
"Iran - then and now" series are often misleading. They cherry-pick extreme examples from non-representative slices of the population. We've all seen photos of the stylish, 1970s Iranian 1%, but not of pervasive poverty and disenfranchisement that their brand of progress perpetuated on the other 99%. The Shah's elite may have looked American but this doesn't mean that they presided over progress or gave much thought to human rights.
- x5n1 11y ago
  The Muslim world has never known how to do democracy right because of a number of reasons including tribalism, nepotism, elitism. They have never understood what it means to be a liberal democracy. Add to that the colonials wanting to continue this tradition because corruption is easier to exploit and we have the precarious situation in the Middle East which has now deteriorated to an unfixable point.