4 ms·
Yep - it was many hundreds of tons. Based on comparing with other records, I'd wager both explosions together likely approached a kiloton of TNT. One of the l
by toufka 11y ago
Yep - it was many hundreds of tons. Based on comparing with other records, I'd wager both explosions together likely approached a kiloton of TNT. One of the larger (possibly?) non-military explosions ever.
Compared with this video for 100 tons of TNT [1], the explosion in Tianjin was a few times larger. And there were two explosions, with the second being significantly larger.
Also, compare with other explosions on this list [2]. The AZF explosion [3] was listed at 20-40 tons of TNT. The Tianjin explosion was far larger. ~20 tons of TNT worth of energy was converted into a seismic wave - the rest (the majority) of the energy was dispersed above ground.
[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PgLzgdbfeJE https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PgLzgdbfeJE
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Largest_artificial_non-nuclear_explosions https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Largest_artificial_non-nuclear...
[3] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K_jodgDNG0o https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K_jodgDNG0o
- trhway 11y agoyes. Similar situation to Tianjin - about 200 tons explosion at 7 seconds sound distance (0:35 explosion and 0:42 sound wave) The blast wave in Tianjin video seems to be somewhat stronger. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=32RCWk5ez34 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=32RCWk5ez34
- r721 11y agoIt also should be noted that "21 tons" is an estimate by China Earthquake Networks Centre [1], so it can be deliberately understated. [1] http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/aug/12/china-explosion-earthquake-recording-instruments-beijing http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/aug/12/china-explosion...