3 ms·

Reuters is pretty known for propaganda and deliberate disinformation of the public. e.g. http://blogs.roosevelt.edu/hsilverman/files/2011/11/Reuters-article-JA

• x5n1 11y ago
  The article is about how Reuters biases public perception in favor of Palestinians and it's written by Henry I. Silverman who may or may not have an agenda of his own. That's the thing, everyone has an agenda. Just because someone is calling someone out on something that does not mean that they themselves are not motivated by their own agenda.
  • evook 11y ago
    Meh, it was an "example given". How much do you want? Another famous one would be MH17 and Fedotov. Also you should read the definition of agenda, you clearly misused it. ("the things that must be done"[1]). The word you were looking for was motive. That Reuters isn't a reliable source of information isn't a matter of motive or "agenda", it is common sense within educated circles. [1]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agenda https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agenda
    • x5n1 11y ago
      "Political agenda, the set of goals of an ideological group. In this context it is often used in a negative sense..."
• cpncrunch 11y ago
  "Pretty known" according to one study (which in itself appears to be the opinion of one person).