4 ms·
This, I think, is what people so often miss when they are talking about agile. It's not a magic set of hard-and-fast rules that should be applied to every situ
by matthewmacleod 11y ago
This, I think, is what people so often miss when they are talking about agile.
It's not a magic set of hard-and-fast rules that should be applied to every situation regardless of how they fit. If you feel you can do without some parts of the canonical process, then drop them. If you feel you'd benefit from some different approaches, you can add them.
Standups are no different, and if your team doesn't need them, or has an alternative that works better for you, then go for it!
- eropple 11y agoThis is, however, used as a dodge by Agile proponents (okay, more specifically Scrum proponents, but the other "Agile" options have mostly receded) to avoid answering to the significant criticisms of the methodologies involved. "Oh, you changed it because we said it was flexible and could be changed? Now you're doing it wrong, the methodology(tm) is fine."