2 ms·

Performance charts on the website ? I had no idea even those where there on the website :) Could you post the link please. BTW the website is running on web-se

by srean 11y ago

Performance charts on the website ? I had no idea even those where there on the website :) Could you post the link please. BTW the website is running on web-server written in Felix and the entire live install image can be browsed online.

nickpsecurity 11y ago
http://felix-lang.org/speed/perf.fdoc http://felix-lang.org/speed/perf.fdoc
- srean 11y ago
  That's the shootout benchmark codes, right ? Are you seeing charts there too ?! The website caches aggressively so it could be that I am seeing stale data. Let me check. Edit: Ah! they are here http://felix-lang.org/speed/ http://felix-lang.org/speed/ in their individual directories
  - nickpsecurity 11y ago
    Im seeing charts which lack the data saying what they mean. Most others have numbers, indicate higher/lower is better for given benchmark, etc. That's my gripe.
    - srean 11y ago
      Oh I understood your gripe from the start. My confusion was that I couldn't locate the plots you were referring to. In any case these are not there to showcase Felix just a sanity check in the build process
      - nickpsecurity 11y ago
        Thanks for clarifying. That makes sense. I think they should do a showcase, though, as performance is a prime concern in language comparisons.
        srean 11y ago
        Indeed. Off topic: Given the description of your lisp tool I think you will find Clasp interesting unless you are the Clasp author :) https://github.com/drmeister/clasp https://github.com/drmeister/clasp
        nickpsecurity 11y ago
        You're like the third person that's suggested that and joked about me being the author. I've been really crunched for time but I plan to get back into LISP soon. Might go ahead and add Clasp to my todo list for that haha. Anyway, I was mainly considering Racket for its powerful metaprogramming abilities, IDE, and their constant optimization of compiler. The enhanced metaprogramming should nicely help with a new instant of my platform given what I did with CL's macros & meta. Thoughts?

by srean 11y ago

nickpsecurity 11y ago

http://felix-lang.org/speed/perf.fdoc http://felix-lang.org/speed/perf.fdoc

srean 11y ago
That's the shootout benchmark codes, right ? Are you seeing charts there too ?! The website caches aggressively so it could be that I am seeing stale data. Let me check. Edit: Ah! they are here http://felix-lang.org/speed/ http://felix-lang.org/speed/ in their individual directories
- nickpsecurity 11y ago
  Im seeing charts which lack the data saying what they mean. Most others have numbers, indicate higher/lower is better for given benchmark, etc. That's my gripe.
  - srean 11y ago
    Oh I understood your gripe from the start. My confusion was that I couldn't locate the plots you were referring to. In any case these are not there to showcase Felix just a sanity check in the build process
    - nickpsecurity 11y ago
      Thanks for clarifying. That makes sense. I think they should do a showcase, though, as performance is a prime concern in language comparisons.
      - srean 11y ago
        Indeed. Off topic: Given the description of your lisp tool I think you will find Clasp interesting unless you are the Clasp author :) https://github.com/drmeister/clasp https://github.com/drmeister/clasp
        nickpsecurity 11y ago
        You're like the third person that's suggested that and joked about me being the author. I've been really crunched for time but I plan to get back into LISP soon. Might go ahead and add Clasp to my todo list for that haha. Anyway, I was mainly considering Racket for its powerful metaprogramming abilities, IDE, and their constant optimization of compiler. The enhanced metaprogramming should nicely help with a new instant of my platform given what I did with CL's macros & meta. Thoughts?