Assume that Daniel is rational. If you want to reach him how about focusing on actions that he might agree to? How about: o increasing funding for monitoring t

Assume that Daniel is rational. If you want to reach him how about focusing on actions that he might agree to? How about: o increasing funding for monitoring temperatures on a worldwide basis so that we can get a better handle on where we are. o increasing funding for monitoring CO2 levels (along with other greenhouse gases) to see if can get more data about the here and now. Certainly we will need better monitoring of both temperature and CO2 gases to understand where we are and to monitor the effectiveness of any interventions that are agreed to. It's often more effective to work from areas where you may agree and to tell if you are having a values conflict or a disagreement over facts and competing hypotheses for explaining them. Another way to look at this would be to ask "what would prove to you the reality of both global warming and C02 as it's cause?" Or to answer "what would prove to me that global warming is not taking place is ________" and "what would prove to me that reducing C02 would not have an impact is _______ "