No, your perspective is absolutely the right one: It is critically imperative that we separate warzones from domestic law enforcement in every way possible. I p

No, your perspective is absolutely the right one: It is critically imperative that we separate warzones from domestic law enforcement in every way possible. I personally believe that combat vets should not be allowed to serve as police officers. Security guards? Sure. Bodyguards? Sure. Law enforcement? No. That's my personal opinion, because it should not be normal to flashbang a building, kick the door in, and rush inside with weapons drawn. But that's how American police departments are beginning to serve warrants for traffic violations. And it doesn't end there, but in particular that distinction is incredibly important. You hit the nail on the head and I could not possibly agree with you more.