4 ms·
in the long run a few front runners will dominate; but right now diversity is good... it allows us to work out what works and what doesn't. the hardest part of
by akamel 11y ago
in the long run a few front runners will dominate; but right now diversity is good... it allows us to work out what works and what doesn't.
the hardest part of making a framework isn't manpower; it's design, architecture, algorithms...
- collyw 11y agoThe amount of diversity in JavaScript frameworks is NOT good in my opinion (a back end dev who needs to get a bit of front end stuff done every so often).
- marrs 11y agoIt's not like you have to use all or any of them. It's more of a problem if you're a front-end dev looking for work and feel obliged to learn whatever is trending at the moment.
- Offler 11y agoReally? You have React, Angular and Ember. Three libraries or frameworks for building web applications. If you aren't building a web application you might not need any of them. Just use React as the other two are copying/converging toward React. All the other web app UI frameworks? Noise, they won't amount to much and add very little. The last release worth paying attention to was React 2 years ago. Hardly a breakneck pace.
- collyw 11y agoAngular 1 or Angular 2? What about Backbone? Meteor? There are a LOT more than 3 frameworks. The choice is overwhelming when you are not a specialist in JS and its difficult to know where to begin. (Though having tested React recently, its the best of the ones I have used).