3 ms·
doesn't the plastic + sunlight + heat combination release dangerous chemicals in the water? also, why are they black, doesn't that attract more heat?
by markyc 11y ago
doesn't the plastic + sunlight + heat combination release dangerous chemicals in the water?
also, why are they black, doesn't that attract more heat?
- erikb 11y agoThat's also what I was wondering. Touching something wet, being warmed by the sun, and all that, can't be good for the black plastic.
- DonHopkins 11y agoThat's what I thought, too. Shiny silver balls would reflect even more light, and look super-cool!
- fyolnish 11y agoAnd they'd sink
- DanBC 11y agoWhy would they sink?
- easytiger 11y agoBeing balls, they would also reflect that light into the water
- legulere 11y agoActually white balls probably would be better. What you normally reach with specular reflection is around 80% reflectivity. With diffuse reflection (white colour) you can get into the 99.x% range much more easily.
- StavrosK 11y agoThey don't care that much about heat, they care more about sunlight not reaching the water, which black balls are more effective at.
- markyc 11y agowhy would black be better than white? i remember an article stating that the melting ice at the poles is accelerating global warming because the white of the ice used to reflect the light coming towards the water
- StavrosK 11y agoBecause white reflects, black absorbs. White balls wouldn't reflect all light upwards. To put it another way, if you were in the water, looking at the surface, which would be brighter? White balls or black balls?
- markyc 11y agomakes sense :)
- rsfern 11y agoThe problem is specifically the ultraviolet photons in the sunlight, which photoactivate the reaction between bromine ions and ozone to form bromate [1]. The visible color shouldn't matter as much as strong absorbance or reflectance in the UV band. I would guess that they're using a plastic that absorbs UV, or contains a dye that does so. 1: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18290477 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18290477