3 ms·
Your comment has even less evidence or analysis than the comments you're complaining about. It's just an angry assertion. It's ok for people to who are not ex
by pg 17y ago
Your comment has even less evidence or analysis than the comments you're complaining about. It's just an angry assertion.
It's ok for people to who are not experts in a subject to explore it. If you feel they're on the wrong track, help them by giving them information.
- antonovka2 17y agoThere's an over-abundance of information. All that's left for HN is angry, emotional quibbling by those who lack the basic qualifications to evaluate the data and science, even if they were interested in actually doing so.
- Panoramix 17y agoThe comments I've read so far present interesting POV's backed up by data and observations. I don't see how that qualifies as "angry emotional quibbling". I don't see the problem with discussing science either. Newton's law of gravitation has been around fot 322 years, and it has been shown to be just a very good approximation (like everything else in science). Also, it is still an open question (AFAIK) whether it holds at very small distances. Climate research is not physics. The number of variables and the complexity of the system is of such magnitude that I am pretty sure there will plenty of room for scientific discussion for years and years to come.