4 ms·
Reread my post. I didn't say that the absence of papers proved anything. I said that the scientific process has been sabotaged in this instance, making things
by robotrout 17y ago
Reread my post. I didn't say that the absence of papers proved anything. I said that the scientific process has been sabotaged in this instance, making things more unclear than they should be.
You are slick though!
EDIT: Perhaps you're honestly confused. I'm a bit doubtful on that, but in case you are. We know that the process has been sabotaged. Not because there are no papers, but because many of the details of the sabotage were revealed in the ClimateGate emails.