2 ms·
If you're getting sick each year (or a long-term illness) and it's costing you your $15k/yr savings, I think many people would be screwed when it comes to cover
by Nadya 11y ago
If you're getting sick each year (or a long-term illness) and it's costing you your $15k/yr savings, I think many people would be screwed when it comes to covering the costs.
Kids are a choice - but even with kids one can still live frugally or prepared. For example, choosing to not have a child until you've accumulated enough savings to cover all of the extra surprise costs that can occur that most people don't plan for when having a child.
My father worked two jobs to barely make ends meet for 8 years because his financial planning revolved around a family plan that he didn't actually plan for. My family plans are actually planned and revolve around my financial plans. One problem I see people make is that their financial plans revolve around their family plans (or lack thereof).
No surprise child at 18 years of age. No poorly-planned "I think I'm ready but I'm not actually ready" child at 21-23 either. I've seen very, very, very few parents under the age of 25 that a) planned for their child and more importantly b) properly planned for their child.
Lack of planning - or having a poorly crafted plan is what is "risky" or "doesn't scale".