4 ms·
It had initially been my intention to have a camera and regulate it, but once I realized how hard it was to keep it going reliably, I decided not to bother with
by MatthiasWandel 11y ago
It had initially been my intention to have a camera and regulate it, but once I realized how hard it was to keep it going reliably, I decided not to bother with that. If a slinky slinks, and nobody is watching, does it matter? And if someone is watching, it's fun to be doing the cranking to keep it going :)
- LeonardA-L 11y agoWell you could launch a website istheslinkyslinking.com with a live cam that shows your contraption at work with the regulation and everything ;) You could even ask for donations with a "keep the slinky slinking" button, so you could pay for electricity and server.
- ctdonath 11y agoIt's not like nobody will ever watch it again. Coming back the next day and enjoying the surprise of "wow - it's still going!", or even telling others "it's been doing this for the last 3 months", would be nice.
- leni536 11y ago> If a slinky slinks, and nobody is watching, does it matter? Man, asking all the hard questions. It reminds me of the "If a tree falls in a forest and no one is around to hear it, does it make a sound?" question. Maybe you could live stream it though. Also note that there are juggling machines that are stable without any active control [1]. Designing a self stabilizing slinky escalator could be really hard though (if not impossible). [1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kj36Z5ZIC6Q https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kj36Z5ZIC6Q
- violentvinyl 11y agoThere is another video on his YouTube channel where he talks about design considerations to make the Slinky slink more reliably. Also, Hi Matthias! I'm a big fan of your YouTube videos, it's really great to see one make it to HN (even if it wasn't linked directly to you).
- crusso 11y agoIf you do another video of the slinky steps in action, have someone stick their face in that window at some random moment for comic effect. ;)