3 ms·
I like this one: http://www2.stetson.edu/~efriedma/squinsqu/ http://www2.stetson.edu/~efriedma/squinsqu/ Can be easily generalized to other shapes and more di
by leni536 11y ago
I like this one:
http://www2.stetson.edu/~efriedma/squinsqu/ http://www2.stetson.edu/~efriedma/squinsqu/
Can be easily generalized to other shapes and more dimensions too.
- pavel_lishin 11y agoDoes the lack of n = 16 mean that there's no current proof?
- leni536 11y ago> For the n not pictured, the trivial packing (with no tilted squares) is the best known packing.