3 ms·

An interactive Python profiler

• jdimov9 11y ago
  Looks awesome, I've been wanting something like this. Trying to install it from Git, however (as the README suggests) fails, because Pip can't find click>=4.1 and urwid>=1.2.1. EDIT: To resolve this, before installing do this: $ pip install git+https://github.com/mitsuhiko/click.git $ pip install git+https://github.com/wardi/urwid.git EDIT2: Never mind, was using outdated mirror. Works just fine.
  • Spiritus 11y ago
    Strange, are you using any local mirrors or something? Because it should be available as you can see here: https://pypi.python.org/simple/click/ https://pypi.python.org/simple/click/
    • jdimov9 11y ago
      Oh, you're right. Crappy corporate set-up.. Works just fine in the wild.
• willvarfar 11y ago
  Excellent! If they want to add flamechart-like visualization that would be excellent. Here's one I made myself back when I was needing to profile some python: http://williamedwardscoder.tumblr.com/post/35134924139/a-novel-profiler-for-python http://williamedwardscoder.tumblr.com/post/35134924139/a-nov...
• JosephRedfern 11y ago
  Looks great! Is there any impact of both the profiler and the target (or profilee?) being run under the same interpreter? I'm thinking impacts of the GIL, specifically...
• crdoconnor 11y ago
  Does this work with the multiprocessing library?
• varlock 11y ago
  Would be awesome if it could be used with nosetests. I've just given it a spin but nosetests seems `overpowering` the profiler.
• wyldfire 11y ago
  Great contribution!