Using extreme examples does not prove a point. Especially when one of them advocates criminal violence. Saying I don't want to hear what you have to say and ac

Using extreme examples does not prove a point. Especially when one of them advocates criminal violence. Saying I don't want to hear what you have to say and actively preventing speech are two completely different things. If a group of students don't want to hear a speaker, they have the right to not show up. They don't have the right to prevent the speech from happening. I don't know if you intended it, but your response is an effort to change the context of what I stated. "Freedom of speech is not freedom to be heard" is what people actively preventing free speech fall back on to justify their actions against the speaker. Not that I'm lumping you in with that way of thinking, just pointing it out.